Voting Machine - Manipulation

The documentary reveals significant printer malfunctions in the Arizona election, affecting ballot accuracy and leading to widespread vote tabulation disruptions.

Misprinted Ballots
Tabulator Rejections
Voter Delays
Equipment Failure
Operational Disruptions
Redundant Votes
Accuracy Concerns
Technical Oversights

Clay Parikh

Former Election System Tester

" How do you know that every ballot that was supposedly rejected by the tabulator was put in and not other ballots? "

WATCH FULL MOVIE
16,724 Door 3 Ballots
8,121 “Fit-to-Page” Ballots
36,411 “System hang” or ghost “paper jam” requiring operator intervention (Non Unique Ballots)
180,894 Ballots Returned to Voter because of Error (Non Unique Ballots)

FAQ on Printer Issues in the Arizona Election

The Arizona election faced significant printer malfunctions, including incorrect ballot dimensions and misprinted markings essential for electronic tabulation.

These issues led to widespread ballot rejection by tabulators, causing operational disruptions, long lines at voting centers, and voter confusion.

'Door Three' refers to a contingency process where ballots that couldn’t be read by malfunctioning printers or tabulators were placed for later processing.

The documentary suggests a lack of thorough pre-election testing, which might have failed to anticipate or address potential printer malfunctions.

The issues predominantly affected in-person voters at locations where the malfunctioning printers were deployed.

Officials attempted to fix malfunctioning equipment and directed voters to alternative voting centers; in some cases, ballots were manually processed.

While the extent of the impact is debated, these issues raised concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the vote count in affected areas.

Enhancing pre-election testing, ensuring backup plans for equipment failure, and improving the overall technology used in elections can help prevent similar issues.

Research Documents

Maricopa County Election Day Printer Failure Investigation Report

On November 8th, 2022, Maricopa County experienced a widespread failure as voters attempted to cast their ballots at Voting Centers across the county.

Election Mechanics - Signature Verification - Tabulator Machines

text will go here

Maricopa County 2022 General Election Ballot-on-Demand Printer Investigation

Ruth V. McGregor Report on a substantial number of ballot- on-demand (BOD) printers at vote centers in Maricopa County produced ballots that could not be tabulated by on-site tabulators.

Maricopa County Reponse to 2022 General Election Issues

text will go here

Maricopa 2022 Training Manual

Poll Worker Training Manual for the 2022 General Election

POST-ELECTION BALLOT ON DEMAND PRINTER ANALYSIS

2022 General Election Internal Review

Overview of Printer Malfunctions
The Arizona election faced significant challenges due to printer malfunctions that directly impacted the voting process. These issues included incorrect printing of ballot dimensions and essential markings for electronic tabulation, leading to widespread ballot rejection by the tabulators. The malfunctioning printers not only caused delays and confusion at voting centers but also raised concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the ballots being cast.

Impact on Voting Process
These printer issues resulted in considerable operational disruptions during the election. Voters experienced extended waiting times and, in some cases, had to visit multiple voting locations due to the malfunctioning equipment. The problems with the printers led to a substantial number of ballots being deemed unreadable by the tabulators, which significantly slowed down the voting process and caused frustration among voters.

The Role of 'Door Three'
'Door Three' became a critical element in managing the fallout from the printer issues. This was a contingency procedure where ballots that could not be read by the malfunctioning printers or tabulators were placed in a separate secure box for later processing. However, the documentary highlights that the 'Door Three' process was not without its challenges. Concerns were raised about the security and accuracy of handling these ballots, as they required additional steps for counting and verification, separate from the standard procedure.

Addressing the Issues and Moving Forward
The documentary suggests that better pre-election testing and maintenance of the printers could have mitigated these issues. In response to the challenges faced, election officials and workers had to adapt quickly, employing manual processes and directing voters to alternative solutions. Going forward, the film underscores the need for more robust and reliable election technology, comprehensive testing protocols, and clear backup procedures to ensure that such issues do not compromise the integrity and smooth functioning of future elections.